Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1008 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 1200 - 428 vs 395 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $164.51 vs $288.82
- Up to 47% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.43 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €320.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15598 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
428
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15597 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |