Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700K is 449 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 1200 - 136 vs 124 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $182.06 vs $288.08
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 1200 - $1.49 vs $2.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €319.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |