Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1987 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $288.08 vs $658.06
- Up to 50% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400F - $1.99 vs $4.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 3 1200 - 182 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
161
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€319.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €319.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.01/FPS
49%
Price, €
€730.45
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |