Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 1008 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 107 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $68.28 vs $288.08
- Up to 78% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.71 vs $3.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €319.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €75.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |