Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4400 is 2714 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 58% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $29.24 vs $69.68
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 172% better in League of Legends than Phenom X4 9650 - 79 vs 29 FPS
- Up to 13% better value when playing League of Legends than Phenom X4 9650 - $0.98 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 54 vs 95 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
29
36.708860759493675%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
87.49999999999999%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3681 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.35
41%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3686 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
34.293948126801155%
Multi-Core
765
64.61148648648648%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Pentium |
Agena | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |