Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 5682 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $29.24 vs $318.79
- Up to 87% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.34 vs $2.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 47% better in Alan Wake 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 140 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 32 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
95
67.85714285714286%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3650 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.53/FPS
13.438735177865615%
Price, €
€353.86
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
7.657657657657657%
Multi-Core
765
3.6355859709153124%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |