Buy on Amazon
€16.19
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 5765 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $14.59 vs $423.33
- Up to 94% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-14900 - $0.16 vs $2.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 58% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9650 - 163 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
103
63.190184049079754%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.19
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom X4 9650 2.30GHz 533MHz Desktop OEM CPU HD9650WCJ4BGH
Buy for €16.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.88/FPS
5.555555555555556%
Price, €
€469.9
3%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-14900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) up to 5.8 GHz
Buy for €469.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
8.078750848608282%
Multi-Core
765
4.822543024648553%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.