Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4737 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $14.59 vs $175.48
- Up to 91% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-11900F - $0.07 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 1 than Phenom X4 9650 - 252 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
226
89.68253968253968%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
9.090909090909092%
Price, €
€194.78
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €194.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
10.962690004606172%
Multi-Core
765
8.341511285574093%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |