Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7740X outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7740X is 3378 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-7740X - $29.24 vs $113.33
- Up to 61% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-7740X - $0.79 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-7740X - 95 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7740X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7740X
- Performs up to 51% better in Starfield than Phenom X4 9650 - 62 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
41
66.12903225806451%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3838 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
38.91625615763547%
Price, €
€125.8
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €125.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3844 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
14.56548347613219%
Multi-Core
765
14.4968732234224%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-7740X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 112 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |