Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 1494 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $29.24 vs $104.93
- Up to 81% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-3770K - $0.2 vs $1.05 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 39% better in FIFA 23 than Phenom X4 9650 - 111 vs 80 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 8 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
80
72.07207207207207%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
19.047619047619047%
Price, €
€116.47
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €116.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
33.663366336633665%
Multi-Core
765
30.984204131227216%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |