Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700F is 5031 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $29.24 vs $160.86
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 934% better in League of Legends than Phenom X4 9650 - 300 vs 29 FPS
- Up to 46% better value when playing League of Legends than Phenom X4 9650 - $0.6 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 20 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
29
9.666666666666666%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
53.57142857142857%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3817 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
300
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€178.55
18%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €178.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
10.076206604572397%
Multi-Core
765
6.63659234839941%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |