Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 5396 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $14.59 vs $584.95
- Up to 97% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13400F - $0.07 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 1 than Phenom X4 9650 - 254 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
226
88.9763779527559%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.56/FPS
2.7343750000000004%
Price, €
€649.29
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for €649.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
10.393013100436681%
Multi-Core
765
7.119590507212657%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |