Buy on Amazon
€32.46
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 5031 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 20% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $29.24 vs $36.56
- Up to 7% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G6900 - $0.28 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Phenom X4 9650 - 135 vs 115 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
115
85.18518518518519%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom X4 9650 2.30GHz 533MHz Desktop OEM CPU HD9650WCJ4BGH
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1801 minutes ago
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
93.33333333333334%
Price, €
€40.58
79%
FPS Winner
Intel Celeron G6900 Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) UHD Graphics 710 Alder Lake (OEM Tray Version) 46W - Reliable Performance for Home and Office
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
14.847161572052403%
Multi-Core
765
28.375370919881306%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.