Buy on Amazon
€32.46
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3659 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 25% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $29.24 vs $39.15
- Up to 26% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G4900 - $0.17 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Phenom X4 9650 - 193 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
187
96.89119170984456%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom X4 9650 2.30GHz 533MHz Desktop OEM CPU HD9650WCJ4BGH
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3653 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
73.91304347826087%
Price, €
€43.46
74%
FPS Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3660 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
38.63636363636363%
Multi-Core
765
72.78782112274025%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.