Buy on Amazon
€32.46
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2714 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in Far Cry 3 than Phenom X4 9650 - 123 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Phenom X4 9650 - $29.18 vs $29.24
- Up to 4% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Phenom X4 9650 - $0.26 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
119
96.7479674796748%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
96.29629629629629%
Price, €
€32.46
99%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 2.30GHz 533MHz Desktop OEM CPU HD9650WCJ4BGH
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1648 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
40.963855421686745%
Multi-Core
765
77.11693548387096%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.