Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 5682 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $138.89 vs $318.79
- Up to 39% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-14900KF - $0.43 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 38% better in Battlefield IV than Phenom X4 9550 - 499 vs 361 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
361
72.34468937875751%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
60.56338028169014%
Price, €
€353.86
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
7.5289575289575295%
Multi-Core
712
3.38370877293033%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |