Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 4737 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $138.89 vs $197.42
- Up to 15% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900 - $1.43 vs $1.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Phenom X4 9550 - 130 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
108
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1953 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
84%
Price, €
€219.14
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1954 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |