Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700T is 3658 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $138.89 vs $145.5
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Phenom X4 9550 - 530 vs 498 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing World of Tanks than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.3 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
498
93.9622641509434%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
96.77419354838709%
Price, €
€154.17
100%
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
530
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
17.700453857791228%
Multi-Core
712
15.178000426348326%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |