Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-760 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-760 is 843 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom X4 9550 - 157 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $73.12 vs $138.89
- Up to 49% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.52 vs $1.01 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |