Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4590 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4590 is 2226 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9550 - 126 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $35.83 vs $138.89
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.32 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 84 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
111
88.09523809523809%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
23.021582733812952%
Price, €
€154.17
25%
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2726 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
20.781527531083483%
Multi-Core
712
22.67515923566879%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |