Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 5765 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $138.89 vs $153.54
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 45% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - 149 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - $1.14 vs $1.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14199 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.43
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €170.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |