Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 5396 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $138.89 vs $658.06
- Up to 69% better value when playing New World than Core i5-13400F - $1.62 vs $5.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 45% better in New World than Phenom X4 9550 - 138 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 16 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
95
68%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.29/FPS
30%
Price, €
€730.45
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |