Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 4417 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Phenom X4 9550 - 201 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $71.3 vs $138.89
- Up to 52% better value when playing Valheim than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.39 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |