Buy on Amazon
€154.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 5031 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Borderlands 3 than Phenom X4 9550 - 222 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $36.56 vs $138.89
- Up to 78% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.18 vs $0.81 per FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
190
85.58558558558559%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
22.22222222222222%
Price, €
€154.17
26%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 2.2GHz 4x512KB Socket AM2+ Quad-Core CPU - CPU ONLY
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2725 minutes ago
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G6900 Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) UHD Graphics 710 Alder Lake (OEM Tray Version) 46W - Reliable Performance for Home and Office
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2737 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
14.597629444791016%
Multi-Core
712
26.409495548961427%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.