Buy on Amazon
€154.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3659 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Phenom X4 9550 - 147 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $39.15 vs $138.89
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.3 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
139
94.5578231292517%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
27.027027027027025%
Price, €
€154.17
28%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 2.2GHz 4x512KB Socket AM2+ Quad-Core CPU - CPU ONLY
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4013 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4020 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
37.98701298701299%
Multi-Core
712
67.74500475737393%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.