Buy on Amazon
€154.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1820 is 2075 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Phenom X4 9550 - 145 vs 143 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $28.95 vs $138.89
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dead Space than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.22 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
143
98.62068965517241%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
20.37037037037037%
Price, €
€154.17
20%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 2.2GHz 4x512KB Socket AM2+ Quad-Core CPU - CPU ONLY
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5738 minutes ago
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel CPU BX80646G1820 Celeron G1820 2.70GHz 2M LGA1150 2C/2T Haswell
Buy for €32.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
47.657841140529534%
Multi-Core
712
86.3030303030303%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.