Buy on Amazon
€154.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1610 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1712 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Phenom X4 9550 - 212 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $27.05 vs $138.89
- Up to 81% better value when playing Fortnite than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.14 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD Phenom X4 9550 2.2GHz 4x512KB Socket AM2+ Quad-Core CPU - CPU ONLY
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.