Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3842 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $138.89 vs $506.05
- Up to 66% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.53 vs $4.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 25% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Phenom X4 9550 - 126 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 24 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
101
80%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.46/FPS
34%
Price, €
€561.72
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Agena | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |