Buy on Amazon
€154.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6100 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6100 is 1294 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - 106 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $21.68 vs $138.89
- Up to 85% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.23 vs $1.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 6 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
103
97.16981132075472%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
15.333333333333336%
Price, €
€154.17
15%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 2.2GHz 4x512KB Socket AM2+ Quad-Core CPU - CPU ONLY
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4011 minutes ago
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
106
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
for AMD CPU FX Series FX-6100 Six Core CPU 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ Processor
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
61.417322834645674%
Multi-Core
712
58.16993464052288%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
| Agena | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.