Buy on Amazon
€154.17
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4300 outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4300 is 1671 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9550 - 115 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $35.11 vs $138.89
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.34 vs $1.39 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
111
96.52173913043478%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
24.460431654676263%
Price, €
€154.17
25%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 2.2GHz 4x512KB Socket AM2+ Quad-Core CPU - CPU ONLY
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3007 minutes ago
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
52.23214285714286%
Multi-Core
712
65.3211009174312%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
| Agena | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.