Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 2968 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 925 - 122 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
22.50351617440225%
Multi-Core
930
10.59104885548343%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Deneb | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
