Buy on Amazon
€30.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1302 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Phenom II X4 925 - 167 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Deneb | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.