Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 4089 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 19% better in Sea of Thieves than Phenom II X4 925 - 237 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
22.03856749311295%
Multi-Core
930
19.918612122510172%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Deneb | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
