Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 4098 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Deathloop than Phenom II X4 810 - 183 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 20 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59854 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Single-Core
293
16.619398752127058%
Multi-Core
876
9.569587065763601%
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |