Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 454 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 175 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 105 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €241.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |