Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3420 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3420 is 82 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than FX-9590 - 256 vs 254 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than FX-9590 - $52.37 vs $217.91
- Up to 76% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-9590 - $0.23 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 53 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
254
99.21875%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
24.210526315789476%
Price, €
€241.88
24%
Buy for €241.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
256
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€58.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €58.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |