Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3502 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $210.6 vs $350.96
- Up to 30% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-13900KS - $1.09 vs $1.56 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in Fortnite than FX-9590 - 249 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 150 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
214
85.94377510040161%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€233.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16722 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
69.87179487179488%
Price, €
€389.57
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €389.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |