Buy on Amazon
€233.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2515 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $210.6 vs $304.01
- Up to 11% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900 - $0.51 vs $0.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 31% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 596 vs 454 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
76.1744966442953%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€233.77
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5195 minutes ago
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
596
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
89.47368421052633%
Price, €
€337.45
69%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €337.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.