Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 812 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than FX-9590 - $73.05 vs $217.91
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - $0.61 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €241.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |