Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400T outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1302 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-9590 - 155 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than FX-9590 - $54.84 vs $210.6
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than FX-9590 - $0.39 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
145
93.54838709677419%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
24.22360248447205%
Price, €
€233.77
26%
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |