Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-5675C outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-5675C is 703 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-9590 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than FX-9590 - $65.81 vs $210.6
- Up to 69% better value when playing Control than FX-9590 - $0.36 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
199
98.51485148514851%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
30.76923076923077%
Price, €
€233.77
31%
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32850 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32852 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |