Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11500 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than FX-9590 - 157 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-9590 - $134.54 vs $217.91
- Up to 43% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-9590 - $0.95 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €241.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9205 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€149.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €149.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |