Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2142 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-9590 - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than FX-9590 - $84.08 vs $217.91
- Up to 63% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-9590 - $0.59 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €241.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |