Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2217 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-9590 - 221 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than FX-9590 - $122.92 vs $210.6
- Up to 45% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-9590 - $0.62 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
207
93.66515837104072%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
54.86725663716815%
Price, €
€233.77
58%
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7160 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
221
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €136.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |