Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2217 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-9590 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than FX-9590 - $122.92 vs $210.6
- Up to 43% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-9590 - $0.71 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
189
98.95287958115183%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
57.258064516129025%
Price, €
€233.77
58%
Buy for €233.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13536 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €136.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13541 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |