Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2321 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $141.8 vs $493.56
- Up to 56% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10940X - $0.65 vs $1.47 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 59% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-9370 - 386 vs 243 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 28 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
243
62.95336787564767%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
386
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
44.21768707482994%
Price, €
€547.85
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €547.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |