Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2515 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $141.8 vs $190.11
- Up to 12% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-10900F - $0.75 vs $0.85 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than FX-9370 - 249 vs 209 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €157.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
88%
Price, €
€211.02
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |