Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2037 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than FX-9370 - 275 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than FX-9370 - $70.2 vs $141.8
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-9370 - $0.28 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €157.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14524 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
275
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |