Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3470 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3470 is 375 days older than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9370 - 171 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than FX-9370 - $43.14 vs $133.8
- Up to 68% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9370 - $0.28 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 77 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €148.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €47.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |