Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3129 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than FX-9370 - 272 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than FX-9370 - $36.56 vs $141.8
- Up to 78% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-9370 - $0.15 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €157.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |