Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 812 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-9370 - 231 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than FX-9370 - $29.18 vs $141.8
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 51 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €157.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |